First of all, let me say that I adore books like Jane Jacobs’s “The Death and Life of Great American Cities” and William H. Whyte’s “The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces”. I therefore felt it would be worthwhile to elaborate on some of the points made in this article.
As you mentioned, Whyte is a keen observer of the environment who loves conducting experiments on how people react to urban and natural settings. I enjoy his “Triangulation” chapter where he argues that a public space needs to offer a variety of attractions to draw people in order to generate a fresh dynamic. He observed each feature in great detail, including the sun, water, food, trees, and seating areas. This inspired me to think critically and come up with details that support my urban design studio. However, there have been some critiques of his plan for movable chairs in the urban plaza. Will it be adaptable to all environments and climates?, a question raised.
Jane Jacobs- As posted in the blog she critiques the modern planning concepts of le Corbusier and Howard Ebenezer. Her “eyes on the street” have given me insights into how streets and sidewalks are designed and planned, and I find this to be really fascinating. She concerns more about cities that it should be looked how it actually works rather than how they should according to urban designers and planners. It’s incredibly interesting to see Chethana’s blog and how she used her images to convey Jacobs’ view of the security and safety of streets.
In addition to the books by Whyte and Jacobs, the book by Gordon Cullen “The concise Townscape” has caught my attention. A visual method of urban design described in the book is ‘Serial vision’. Working on a series of revelations while maintaining interest and contrast in order to maintain excitement and foster a lively atmosphere is the focus of Serial Vision. Personally, I advise reading the book as it an art that shows the city in a picturesque way.
Urban interventions: Part A
Deriving the urban interventions for urban design based on the principles from the paper reads. The first blog explores the medium that activates street life, and the philosophies that are required to enhance the overall quality of the streets in day-to-day life.
Takebacks on well-renowned authors regarding the uses of sidewalks in the city that redefine the space analogy, which goes hand in hand with the critical regionalism that enhances the quality of space.
- Takebacks on 1. Jacobs, J, The uses of sidewalk: safety, in The City Reader
- Takebacks on 2. “Critical Regionalism: An Architecture of Place” from Repairing the American Metropolis: Common Place Revisited (2002)
1a. Quick overview of the architect and his work:
Whyte William is a popular sociologist who helped draft a comprehensive design plan to improve New York City’s parks and plazas. Hunter college in the City University of New York appointed him as a distinguished professor. By surveying and interviewing people, he understood the demographics and formed a hypothesis about how people used the urban space. He also assisted in developing a restoration plan for Bryant Park, New York. Through his study, he also observed that women tend to use public plazas more often than their counterparts and are sensitive to annoyances. He is a keen observer of the environmental factors that contribute to the public plaza design.
Figure 1
b. Whyte William’s idea regarding the urban scape and how the quality of street life influences the mindset of the people:
Observation of the New York City plazas was made using sighting maps, time-lapse cameras, and interviewing people. The male-female ratio suggested well-managed public plazas. He was a keen observer as to where each gender would occupy the seats based on preferences. The functionality of space also guided the different categories of where people would gather. The effective radius in the core of the downtown area of New York is about 3 blocks, and about 80% of the people occupy the area.
Figure 2
c. Location of plazas in the public realm:
Location is one of the key factors in analyzing how actively the spaces would be utilized. Some of the best plazas were in close proximity to public transit and had strong pedestrian access. Some of the popular plazas in New York were narrow and long rather than widely stretched out. The light and air were crucial aspects to be considered while designing these public plazas. Seating was a major concern in how these spaces were utilized and how active they were.
Figure 3
2a. Quick overview of the architect and his work:
Jane Jacobs is a neighborhood activist who started writing about city life and urban planning as an associate editor of Architectural Forum.
Figure 4
Her book “The Death and Life of Great American Cities” hit the world with a different chord in 1961. She intends that “meanwhile parks are good, the crowding was bad”. The parks could be potentially dangerous and the safest place for children could be the crowded neighborhood. She critiqued the contributions of Le Corbusier and Ebenezer Howard in the book “Home Remedies for Urban Cancer”.
Figure 5
Figure 6
b. Outlining the factors that differentiate a good city sidewalk from an unsafe city sidewalk:
The Death and Life of Great American Cities were Jane Jacob’s finest works. She focuses on “The Uses of Sidewalks: Safety”, outlining her basic notions that essentially make the neighborhood safe for both women and children. This book was a scathing attack on the planning establishment. Nonetheless, it was a loving invitation for the middle-class gentrification of a formally working neighborhood. In contrast to Louis Wirth’s theory, which is based on the size, heterogeneity, and density in the city creates a distinct urban personality. She talks about social cohesion and the reality of safety and the overall perception.
Figure 7
Figure 8
c. Importance of streets in day-to-day life:
Some of the former books of Jacob include “The Economy of Cities and Systems of Survival”. She talks about the importance of streets and how it serves a purpose besides vehicles. The streets are the fundamental element that makes the city interesting, and the safety of the sidewalks is the key factor bordering the great cities that distinguish the suburbs and the urban cities based on this factor. She points out that if this fails, it leads to the failure of the city structure attracting robbery and unsafe environments at various degrees using the example of Los Angeles and how the crime rates are astounding. She points out the failing factors and how they can be avoided by straightforward methods rather than evading the issues of the city streets being unsafe. By adding repetitive enterprises to initiate the usage of sidewalks. She uses the example of Hudson Street, where she lives, and how active, usable, and safe the streets are both during the day and night. These are some of the fine examples along with the other cities of Boston or any other animated neighborhood of great cities that unite the joint effect of the sidewalk which is not differentiated in the least and that is its strength.
Figure 9
Figure 10
Picture courtesy:
Figure 1 and 2 : https://cyclingindustry.news/tfl-endorses-nactos-priority-for-active-travel-street-design-guide/
Figure 3,5,6,7,8,9 and 10: https://www.rios.com/projects/horton-plaza/
First of all, let me say that I adore books like Jane Jacobs’s “The Death and Life of Great American Cities” and William H. Whyte’s “The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces”. I therefore felt it would be worthwhile to elaborate on some of the points made in this article.
As you mentioned, Whyte is a keen observer of the environment who loves conducting experiments on how people react to urban and natural settings. I enjoy his “Triangulation” chapter where he argues that a public space needs to offer a variety of attractions to draw people in order to generate a fresh dynamic. He observed each feature in great detail, including the sun, water, food, trees, and seating areas. This inspired me to think critically and come up with details that support my urban design studio. However, there have been some critiques of his plan for movable chairs in the urban plaza. Will it be adaptable to all environments and climates?, a question raised.
Jane Jacobs- As posted in the blog she critiques the modern planning concepts of le Corbusier and Howard Ebenezer. Her “eyes on the street” have given me insights into how streets and sidewalks are designed and planned, and I find this to be really fascinating. She concerns more about cities that it should be looked how it actually works rather than how they should according to urban designers and planners. It’s incredibly interesting to see Chethana’s blog and how she used her images to convey Jacobs’ view of the security and safety of streets.
In addition to the books by Whyte and Jacobs, the book by Gordon Cullen “The concise Townscape” has caught my attention. A visual method of urban design described in the book is ‘Serial vision’. Working on a series of revelations while maintaining interest and contrast in order to maintain excitement and foster a lively atmosphere is the focus of Serial Vision. Personally, I advise reading the book as it an art that shows the city in a picturesque way.
I remembered a line from William Whyte after reading this blog- “The street is the river of life of the city, the place where we come together, the pathway to the center.”
He showed us how only by observing and talking to people, that we can learn a great deal about what people want in public spaces and can put this knowledge to work in creating places that shape livable communities. And his bottom-up approach to designing a place starts with a thorough understanding of the way people use spaces, and the way they would like to use spaces. Whyte states that people vote with their feet – they use spaces that are easy to use and comfortable.
No doubt, William H. Whyte’s revolutionary Street Life Project findings in the book “The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces” is a mini-revolution in the planning and study of public spaces. It has since become standard texts and appears on syllabi and reading lists in urban planning, sociology, environmental design, and architecture departments around the world.
Jacobs introduced many concepts and terminologies that are still today often used in the field of urban studies, such as the “city as an ecosystem”, the “mixed-use urban development” or the “bottom-up community planning”, and also, “eyes on the street”, with which she encouraged communities to look at their neighbors and commit themselves to them, thus creating networks and collaboration and mutual care.
In the book, “Death and Life of Great American Cities”, she focused on “The Uses of Sidewalks: Safety and outlines her basic notions of what makes a neighborhood a community and what makes a city livable. And also criticized orthodox city Planners to take a prescriptive approach to urbanism, while people have their own ideas about what makes good places that don’t fit the standard orthodoxy.
She protests against many projects like Lower Manhattan Expressway in New York, and Padina Expressway in Toronto. She always opposed top-down decision-making, as practiced by “master builders” like Moses. Her contributions have been indispensable for a change of perspective in city development. Unfortunately, after so many years and despite the clarity with which she transmitted her ideas, her messages still today need to be passed on to governments and large corporations. Cities are for people, and decision-making should not just depend on the planning experts or large construction companies, but on urban communities and their local experience.