Firstly, this is an excellent Blog in that it comprehensively explores the benefits of mixed-use communities and the potential challenges that could be involved. Moreover, the blog mentions that mixed-use neighbourhoods could reduce transport dependency, enhance community vibrancy and promote social inclusion by combining residential, commercial and recreational facilities within the same area. It largely accommodates Ustaoglu and Williams’ (2024) claim that denser and multifunctional urban areas could make more efficient use of space, potentially improving the quality of life by creating a more liveable and less transport-dependent environment. Although mixed-site neighbourhoods promote the integration and interaction of different social groups, mixed-site development strategies for this kind of diversity require careful design. This is due to the fact that mixed-income housing to balance socio-economic differences in a community may inadvertently increase the social isolation of low-income residents (DeFilippis and Fraser, 2010). Consequently, urban planners and designers should engage in establishing mechanisms for dialogue and cooperation between multi-stakeholders, including governments, businesses and communities, to make sure that mixed-use developments can achieve their long-term social and environmental ambitions. As Fraser, Chaskin and Bazuin (2013) highlight successful mixed-income development requires careful consideration of the social, economic and political contexts of marginalised communities, which suggests that isolated interventions are insufficient. Overall, mixed-use neighbourhoods provide an effective way to reduce urban sprawl and enhance community vitality, however, their successful implementation depends on comprehensive policy support, financial investment and active participation of community residents.
References:
Defilippis, J. and Fraser, J. (2020). “Why Do We Want Mixed-Income Housing and Neighborhoods?” transcript Verlag eBooks, pp.353–368. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839453513-016. (Accessed: 26 March 2024)
Fraser, J.C., Chaskin, R.J. and Joshua Theodore Bazuin (2013). “Making Mixed-Income Neighborhoods Work for Low-Income Households”. Cityscape, 15(2), p.83. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/41959112. (Accessed: 26 March 2024)
Ustaoglu, E. and Williams, B. (2024). “The Inter-Relationships of Territorial Quality of Life with Residential Expansion and Densification: A Case Study of Regions in EU Member Countries”. Urban science, 8(1), pp.22–22. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci8010022. (Accessed: 26 March 2024)
Firstly, this is an excellent Blog in that it comprehensively explores the benefits of mixed-use communities and the potential challenges that could be involved. Moreover, the blog mentions that mixed-use neighbourhoods could reduce transport dependency, enhance community vibrancy and promote social inclusion by combining residential, commercial and recreational facilities within the same area. It largely accommodates Ustaoglu and Williams’ (2024) claim that denser and multifunctional urban areas could make more efficient use of space, potentially improving the quality of life by creating a more liveable and less transport-dependent environment. Although mixed-site neighbourhoods promote the integration and interaction of different social groups, mixed-site development strategies for this kind of diversity require careful design. This is due to the fact that mixed-income housing to balance socio-economic differences in a community may inadvertently increase the social isolation of low-income residents (DeFilippis and Fraser, 2010). Consequently, urban planners and designers should engage in establishing mechanisms for dialogue and cooperation between multi-stakeholders, including governments, businesses and communities, to make sure that mixed-use developments can achieve their long-term social and environmental ambitions. As Fraser, Chaskin and Bazuin (2013) highlight successful mixed-income development requires careful consideration of the social, economic and political contexts of marginalised communities, which suggests that isolated interventions are insufficient. Overall, mixed-use neighbourhoods provide an effective way to reduce urban sprawl and enhance community vitality, however, their successful implementation depends on comprehensive policy support, financial investment and active participation of community residents.
References:
Defilippis, J. and Fraser, J. (2020). “Why Do We Want Mixed-Income Housing and Neighborhoods?” transcript Verlag eBooks, pp.353–368. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839453513-016. (Accessed: 26 March 2024)
Fraser, J.C., Chaskin, R.J. and Joshua Theodore Bazuin (2013). “Making Mixed-Income Neighborhoods Work for Low-Income Households”. Cityscape, 15(2), p.83. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/41959112. (Accessed: 26 March 2024)
Ustaoglu, E. and Williams, B. (2024). “The Inter-Relationships of Territorial Quality of Life with Residential Expansion and Densification: A Case Study of Regions in EU Member Countries”. Urban science, 8(1), pp.22–22. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci8010022. (Accessed: 26 March 2024)
First of all, this is a very good blog. The author deeply discusses the advantages and disadvantages of creating mixed-use community, and brings new ideas and directions for the development of mixed-use community.
In the author’s eyes, the necessity of the construction and development of mixed communities is brought about by the increase of floating population and urban expansion. Mixed community is an effective measure to improve community convenience and safety. Mixed communities can reduce traffic pressure, bring diverse development to the area, and stimulate economic growth. This allows each community to have its own unique appeal, more able to cater to the needs of different groups of people, and produce more choices.
At the same time, mixed communities have some problems to solve. For example, the squeeze on the living space of low-income groups and affordable housing has produced certain social problems, which we need to pay attention to and solve again. The first thing I would like to add is the impact of mixed-use communities on traditional historical buildings. We need to pay attention to the protection of special buildings and special people while developing communities. Secondly, the construction of ecological community, the process of community development can not ignore the impact on the environment, community ecology is the focus of community development can not be ignored.
Reference:
Passell, A. (2021) Preserving Neighborhoods : How Urban Policy and Community Strategy Shape Baltimore and Brooklyn.
Baran, M. & Jones, J.E. (2020) Includes bibliographical references and index. Applied social science approaches to mixed methods research.
Cody, M.L. (2020) Competition and the Structure of Bird Communities. (MPB-7), Volume 7.