“Phytoremediation”, as mentioned in the article, is also a topic of interest to me. After seeing the case study provided by Shu Lei, I also thought about the content of phytoremediation. I found that planting and managing plants in the urban environment is a developmental process that improves the ecological environment of the city and the quality of life of the inhabitants. Using plants to restore cities can be effective in improving the urban environment. Useful and powerful advantages. Firstly, it can be reflected in air purification, as plants can absorb carbon dioxide through photosynthesis and release oxygen, effectively purifying the air. Secondly, plants have the ability to retain water and reduce soil erosion and flooding. Thirdly, plants can also improve the structure of the soil, restore contaminated soil and reduce the content of heavy metals and organic matter in the soil. The ecological function of the soil is restored. Fourthly, phytoremediation can provide habitats that are adapted for organisms to inhabit and flourish. It builds suitable habitats and promotes urban ecological balance. In summary, the use of phytoremediation to improve the urban environment has a number of advantages. Together, these advantages can contribute to the sustainable development of cities.
[1] Liu Bing, et al. “Phytoremediation of Urban Environmental Pollution.” Environmental Science and Technology 28.1 (2005): 109-111.
Application of Phytoremediation in Urban Design
In class on Monday this week, Professor Timothy mentioned the word “phytoremediation”. I was very interested in this and read and analyzed some articles.
The globalisation of the international economy has accelerated population migration and increased urbanisation, leading in the expansion of cities. As traditional industries cause more environmental damage and exhaust nonrenewable resources, modern society is gradually reforming and eliminating them, resulting in a massive amount of land becoming contaminated by industry and eventually becoming unable to develop in many ways. Due to economic and other societal reasons, these lands are difficult to dispose of, and they typically remain idle and finally become abandoned. Abandoned land makes adequate use of the enormous amount of vacant land impossible, and it also has an impact on the metropolitan landscape and the ecological environment.
RL Chaney called for the use of super-enriched plants to remove heavy metal contamination from soil in order to eliminate or reduce contamination levels and thereby repair the ecosystem in 1983[1]. In recent years, with the deepening of theoretical research on phytoremediation, phytoremediation, as an ecological restoration technology using plants and rhizosphere microorganisms to purify the environment, combined with landscape design and urban design, has been accepted by more and more people[2].
Case analysis
The North Duisburg Landscape Park was previously a Ruhr industrial district, and the natural environment suffered considerably as a result of early environmental neglect and unregulated industrial expansion[3]. The Ruhr industrial area employs ecological restoration technology to repair and transform the severely damaged ecosystem into an urban park.
Figure1: Landsclaftspark Duisburg-Nord Comparison chart before and after transformation
Source: https://www.publicspace.org/works/-/project/a008-landschaftspark-duisburg-nord
Butchart Gardens, located on Vancouver Island in Canada, is well-known for its ecological restoration of abandoned mines and cement facilities. The Butchart Garden uses natural construction methods with the purpose of long-term development. It attempts to preserve as much of the original shape of the site as possible while also providing a place for plants to thrive by constructing a sunken garden, a Japanese garden, an Italian garden, a rose garden, and a Ross fountain, among other garden designs.
Figure2: Current status of Butchart Gardens
Source:https://www.tourismvictoria.com/see-do/activities-attractions/garden-parks/butchart-gardens
We can draw from the instances above that, as plant development and restoration technology improve, phytoremediation technology will be widely adopted as the final phase in brownfield restoration. As a healthy planting landscape, this will have long-term effects on the ecology and landscape of brownfields.
[1] CHANEY RL. Plant uptake of inorganic waste constituents[J]. Land Treatment of Hazardous Wastes, 1983, 50-76.
[2] PILONSMITS E. Phytoremediation [J]. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2005, 56: 15-39.
[3] Ding Yiju, Luo Hua. A Masterpiece of Post-Industrial Landscape——Analysis of Landscape Park in North Duisburg, Germany[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2003(7):4.
“Phytoremediation”, as mentioned in the article, is also a topic of interest to me. After seeing the case study provided by Shu Lei, I also thought about the content of phytoremediation. I found that planting and managing plants in the urban environment is a developmental process that improves the ecological environment of the city and the quality of life of the inhabitants. Using plants to restore cities can be effective in improving the urban environment. Useful and powerful advantages. Firstly, it can be reflected in air purification, as plants can absorb carbon dioxide through photosynthesis and release oxygen, effectively purifying the air. Secondly, plants have the ability to retain water and reduce soil erosion and flooding. Thirdly, plants can also improve the structure of the soil, restore contaminated soil and reduce the content of heavy metals and organic matter in the soil. The ecological function of the soil is restored. Fourthly, phytoremediation can provide habitats that are adapted for organisms to inhabit and flourish. It builds suitable habitats and promotes urban ecological balance. In summary, the use of phytoremediation to improve the urban environment has a number of advantages. Together, these advantages can contribute to the sustainable development of cities.
[1] Liu Bing, et al. “Phytoremediation of Urban Environmental Pollution.” Environmental Science and Technology 28.1 (2005): 109-111.