First of all, thank you very much for posting. The content of the blog clearly shows what is the core point of international urban master planning and landscape urbanism and the core points and challenges it will face. Overall, the logic is rigorous, the structure is clear, and the author’s intentions are easy to understand. I am very interested in what is the master planning and landscape urbanism of the international city mentioned in the article, I would like to know that the master planning and landscape urbanism of the international city introduced in your article is constructed through the latest technology, ideas, materials and other elements The way of thinking of the city, I want to know the solutions that have been implemented, such as what the latest technologies or concepts have been applied to the design. This will make me more emotional, if it is just an abstract concept, it is difficult for me to imagine and resonate. The blog lists the difference between internationalization and localization and the three core points of international master planning and landscape urbanism, such as international urban master planning and landscape urbanism. Support and sustainable urban planning and design. This has good guiding significance for our design. Then this blog enumerates the core points, but it does not provide a relative number of case studies to describe these core points, it would be more convincing if there were some case studies that could help us understand it better.In addition, I don’t quite understand the relationship between some pictures and the article. I think some pictures can be added to the article to make it easier for readers to understand. These are areas that I think can be improved. The blog also mentions the challenges and prospects at the end, but it seems a bit simple to only use one sentence for the prospect. Looking forward to your future blog sharing.
Beyond your imagination — International Urban Master Planning and Landscape Urbanism
（Download from Bing）
What is international masterplaning and landscape urbanism
International urban master planning and landscape urbanism are ways of thinking about building a city by applying the latest technologies, ideas, materials and other elements. It has high requirements for the construction foundation of the city, the ideological openness and adaptability of local residents. It is not only an urban construction measure of the government, but also a mode of multi-party coordination
（Download from Bing）
The difference between internationalization and localization
The difference between international master planning and landscape urbanism compared with local master planning and landscape urbanism is that the former has more avant-garde design ideas. Such planning is closely related to important events, technologies or ideas taking place in the world.
In addition, the significant difference between international urban master planning and local master planning is that the former pays more attention to long-term development and less consideration to current costs. The latter pays more attention to short-term economic benefits and lacks long-term development. This is mainly due to the differences in policies and systems among countries.
Core points of international masterplaning and landscape urbanism
First of all, International Urban Master Planning and Landscape Urbanism attaches great importance to the relationship between city and nature. The concepts of Landscape Ecology, Ecological Urbanism and Landscape Urbanism aim to find ways to integrate nature with architecture and urban design. Due to the rapid expansion of cities, especially in developing countries, the ecological space of many cities has been damaged to varying degrees. The impact of ecological destruction is huge. Our water, air, light and sound have become more and more uncomfortable. This change is not sudden, but gradually changes with development. However, this damage is difficult to repair. Therefore, we need to pay great attention to this and take a series of measures to stop this damage and repair the ecology. In my opinion, this is the basic condition for whether the city is livable.
（Download from Bing）
On the other hand, new technology is a strong support for international landscape design. The aim of landscape urbanism is to produce new open-space morphologies by generating, integrating and mediating ecological systems with a well-developed understanding of the ground as well as deploying a fluid built form that incorporates a new infrastructural sensibility. Compared with the previous landscape design, international landscape design has become more “scientific”. It is mainly reflected in the design that the best form can be obtained through mathematical calculation. After the implementation, the relevant information of these landscapes can be collected by sensors, so as to optimize and improve them.
（Download from Bing）
In addition, sustainable urban planning and design is also one of the most important core points. In recent years, the energy problem has attracted more and more attention in the world. In the past few decades, due to the underdevelopment of energy technology, polluting energy has been basically used all over the world. Now, with the development of technology, more and more developed countries in the world begin to use clean energy, because clean energy will not cause damage to the earth, which is sustainable. Sustainability is important because if we continue to use low-cost polluting energy, our living environment will quickly become bad and animals and plants will die soon. Therefore, polluting energy is bound to be replaced, although their cost is often very low. In the long run, sustainability is an inevitable trend and a common value reached by all people in the world. Therefore, in my opinion, sustainability is a very representative embodiment of international urban master planning and landscape urbanism.
（Download from Bing）
Challenges and prospects
The biggest challenge that international urban master planning and landscape urbanism are facing is that the overall international acceptance of new planning and design concepts is not high. Most cities have limited economic development, and residents are content with the status quo and do not want to change. Therefore, many international and relatively avant-garde ideas are difficult to implement.
On the other hand, those cities that accept the concept of internationalization themselves have a very high degree of internationalization. The economy of such cities is generally high. When they accept the international planning concept, they will become stronger and the gap between the rich and the poor will widen to a certain extent. In addition, when these cities generally accept these ideas, their development direction will be relatively close, resulting in the problem of convergence among cities.
Nevertheless, international urban planning and landscape urbanism are still the focus of attention in the future, and I am optimistic about its prospect.
First of all, thank you very much for posting. The content of the blog clearly shows what is the core point of international urban master planning and landscape urbanism and the core points and challenges it will face. Overall, the logic is rigorous, the structure is clear, and the author’s intentions are easy to understand. I am very interested in what is the master planning and landscape urbanism of the international city mentioned in the article, I would like to know that the master planning and landscape urbanism of the international city introduced in your article is constructed through the latest technology, ideas, materials and other elements The way of thinking of the city, I want to know the solutions that have been implemented, such as what the latest technologies or concepts have been applied to the design. This will make me more emotional, if it is just an abstract concept, it is difficult for me to imagine and resonate. The blog lists the difference between internationalization and localization and the three core points of international master planning and landscape urbanism, such as international urban master planning and landscape urbanism. Support and sustainable urban planning and design. This has good guiding significance for our design. Then this blog enumerates the core points, but it does not provide a relative number of case studies to describe these core points, it would be more convincing if there were some case studies that could help us understand it better.In addition, I don’t quite understand the relationship between some pictures and the article. I think some pictures can be added to the article to make it easier for readers to understand. These are areas that I think can be improved. The blog also mentions the challenges and prospects at the end, but it seems a bit simple to only use one sentence for the prospect. Looking forward to your future blog sharing.