The topic surrounding pedestrian friendly urban design is an exciting subject and one that has increased significantly in popularity since COVID. The factors related to the walkable city were evident to many of the population at this time, along with the challenges that are associated with them. The aim of my response is to engage in discussion with yourself and this lecture topic and expand upon your initial acknowledgment of accessibility and the walkable city.
Whilst there is no question about the positive impacts towards a walkable city, there is a question around provisions of an accessible pedestrian friendly city. An accessible city is a place that successfully provides ‘equal opportunities and a seamless experience for all its residents, regardless of their physical or neural abilities’ (Rabie, 2023). Communities that are not included within the able-bodied majority often suffer from the lack of accessibly and awareness when initiatives, such as the 15 minutes or 20 minutes cities, are put in place to improve walkability within the urban environment.
Across the world, many cities have made attempts to design a more inclusive environment through awareness and policy making. The Department of Transport in the UK have acknowledged that an accessible environment does not stop at the provisions for wheelchair users and have therefore provided a ‘best practice’ design guide which looks to address features of an ‘inclusive environment and issues related to disabling barriers, the use of technology, maintenance, awareness of the needs of disabled people, and engagement’ (2021, p. 9). London is a global leader that has recognised the importance of information accessibility for its residents and the large volume of tourists the city receives. VisitLondon is partnered with AccessAble to provide thorough insights into the city and what provision are available. The website itself also caters for the audibly impaired by offering BSL videos on each website page.
However, I would also argue that an accessible city is one that activity responds to the changing shifts in society, such as the need for design interventions and awareness around women in the city. Whyte and his ‘The Street Life Project’ was pioneering in its deliberate observation of gender differences in urban space. Whyte not only had a conscious observation but also actively employed women within his research team to assist with understanding the movements of women within the urban environment, as he believed that ‘if a plaza has a high proportion of women, it is probably a good and well managed one’ (Whyte, 2011, p. 511).
Nonetheless, one potential challenge to an accessible and therefore pedestrian friendly city is gentrification. This challenge is also a general and prominent critique of Jane Jacobs ‘eyes on the street’ concept. The concern for place-based identify and gentrification is echoed by Lees who argues that ‘gentrification leads to social segregation, social polarisation and displacement’ (2008, 2457). However, as mentioned, with appropriate policies, community engagement, place-based approaches, and strategic planning, I believe the negative impacts can be avoided.
REFERENCES
Intrinsic Paths, (2023) Pedestrian Dignity, Available at: https://www.intrinsicpaths.com/pedestrian-dignity (accessed 28/03/24)
Lees, L., 2008, Gentrification and social mixing: Towards an inclusive urban renaissance? Urban Studies 45 (12), pp. 2449-2470
Rabie, R., (2023) ‘Accessibility is the key to an inclusive city’, IE Insights, 29 November, Available at: https://www.ie.edu/insights/articles/accessibility-is-the-key-to-an-inclusive-city/#:~:text=This%20involves%20incorporating%20features%20such,information%20accessibility%20is%20equally%20vital [accessed 28/03/24]
Whyte, William, The design of spaces, in LeGates, R.T. & Stout, F. (2011) The city reader. 5th ed. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge, pp.510-517.
The topic surrounding pedestrian friendly urban design is an exciting subject and one that has increased significantly in popularity since COVID. The factors related to the walkable city were evident to many of the population at this time, along with the challenges that are associated with them. The aim of my response is to engage in discussion with yourself and this lecture topic and expand upon your initial acknowledgment of accessibility and the walkable city.
Whilst there is no question about the positive impacts towards a walkable city, there is a question around provisions of an accessible pedestrian friendly city. An accessible city is a place that successfully provides ‘equal opportunities and a seamless experience for all its residents, regardless of their physical or neural abilities’ (Rabie, 2023). Communities that are not included within the able-bodied majority often suffer from the lack of accessibly and awareness when initiatives, such as the 15 minutes or 20 minutes cities, are put in place to improve walkability within the urban environment.
Across the world, many cities have made attempts to design a more inclusive environment through awareness and policy making. The Department of Transport in the UK have acknowledged that an accessible environment does not stop at the provisions for wheelchair users and have therefore provided a ‘best practice’ design guide which looks to address features of an ‘inclusive environment and issues related to disabling barriers, the use of technology, maintenance, awareness of the needs of disabled people, and engagement’ (2021, p. 9). London is a global leader that has recognised the importance of information accessibility for its residents and the large volume of tourists the city receives. VisitLondon is partnered with AccessAble to provide thorough insights into the city and what provision are available. The website itself also caters for the audibly impaired by offering BSL videos on each website page.
However, I would also argue that an accessible city is one that activity responds to the changing shifts in society, such as the need for design interventions and awareness around women in the city. Whyte and his ‘The Street Life Project’ was pioneering in its deliberate observation of gender differences in urban space. Whyte not only had a conscious observation but also actively employed women within his research team to assist with understanding the movements of women within the urban environment, as he believed that ‘if a plaza has a high proportion of women, it is probably a good and well managed one’ (Whyte, 2011, p. 511).
Nonetheless, one potential challenge to an accessible and therefore pedestrian friendly city is gentrification. This challenge is also a general and prominent critique of Jane Jacobs ‘eyes on the street’ concept. The concern for place-based identify and gentrification is echoed by Lees who argues that ‘gentrification leads to social segregation, social polarisation and displacement’ (2008, 2457). However, as mentioned, with appropriate policies, community engagement, place-based approaches, and strategic planning, I believe the negative impacts can be avoided.
REFERENCES
Intrinsic Paths, (2023) Pedestrian Dignity, Available at: https://www.intrinsicpaths.com/pedestrian-dignity (accessed 28/03/24)
Lees, L., 2008, Gentrification and social mixing: Towards an inclusive urban renaissance? Urban Studies 45 (12), pp. 2449-2470
Rabie, R., (2023) ‘Accessibility is the key to an inclusive city’, IE Insights, 29 November, Available at: https://www.ie.edu/insights/articles/accessibility-is-the-key-to-an-inclusive-city/#:~:text=This%20involves%20incorporating%20features%20such,information%20accessibility%20is%20equally%20vital [accessed 28/03/24]
Whyte, William, The design of spaces, in LeGates, R.T. & Stout, F. (2011) The city reader. 5th ed. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge, pp.510-517.