Hi, I want to thank you for your blog post. Your blog post talks about how city planners have a big effect on the ways we live and talk to each other in towns. The article looks at the big plans for development and shows how they often ignore what locals care about. Instead, it presents bottom-up ideas to show that local people should be involved in making their places better. The word “development refugees” used by anthropologist Thayer Scudder describes the problem faced when big projects push people away or leave them out, not considering their needs and ideas. (Scudder, 1981). This way of doing things, known as “growth from above feeling,” shows a gap between those who decide and the real people in these areas.
The big thinking talks about real-life examples like Boris Johnson’s Nine Elms plan in London. It specifically looks at the changes made to Battersea Power Station. This example sadly shows the big difference between what was promised in a community and what really happened. It clearly brings out how fancy-focused building projects can cause problems, especially when there is poverty and house issues around (Nixon, 2010). The lack of promised cheap homes and the arrival of jobs that don’t pay much shows we haven’t really raised up local people. The call for inclusive design processes resonates strongly, advocating for the involvement of affected communities in urban development plans (Vijay, 2018). By emphasizing the need to strike a balance between grand visions and grassroots considerations, you champion a more holistic approach that benefits all societal strata.
Finally, the blog effectively intertwines real-world examples with academic insights from publications by scholars like Scudder and McMillan, solidifying your arguments with well-referenced literature. The addition of the image from Ravencroft’s depiction of Battersea Power Station serves as a visual anchor, reinforcing the tangible implications of such large-scale urban projects (Ravencroft, 2022). Overall, your commentary provokes thought on the ethical responsibility of urban designers and policymakers to prioritize exclusivity and community welfare in shaping our urban landscapes.
References
Nixon, R. (2010). Unimagined communities: Developmental refugees, megadams and monumental modernity. New Formations, 69(69), 62-80. (Accessed: 2 January 2024).
Ravencroft, T (2022) Battersea October 05 2022. [online image] (Accessed: October 24, 2023) https://www.dezeen.com/2022/10/05/battersea-power-station-opens-wilkinson- eyre/. (Accessed: 2 January 2024)
Vijay, A. (2018). Dissipating the political: battersea power station and the temporal aesthetics of development. Open Cultural Studies, 2(1), 611-625. (Accessed: 2 January 2024)
Scudder, T. (1981) What It Means to be Dammed. Available at: https://calteches.library.caltech.edu/3291/1/Scudder.pdf. (Accessed: 2 January 2024)
Hi, I want to thank you for your blog post. Your blog post talks about how city planners have a big effect on the ways we live and talk to each other in towns. The article looks at the big plans for development and shows how they often ignore what locals care about. Instead, it presents bottom-up ideas to show that local people should be involved in making their places better. The word “development refugees” used by anthropologist Thayer Scudder describes the problem faced when big projects push people away or leave them out, not considering their needs and ideas. (Scudder, 1981). This way of doing things, known as “growth from above feeling,” shows a gap between those who decide and the real people in these areas.
The big thinking talks about real-life examples like Boris Johnson’s Nine Elms plan in London. It specifically looks at the changes made to Battersea Power Station. This example sadly shows the big difference between what was promised in a community and what really happened. It clearly brings out how fancy-focused building projects can cause problems, especially when there is poverty and house issues around (Nixon, 2010). The lack of promised cheap homes and the arrival of jobs that don’t pay much shows we haven’t really raised up local people. The call for inclusive design processes resonates strongly, advocating for the involvement of affected communities in urban development plans (Vijay, 2018). By emphasizing the need to strike a balance between grand visions and grassroots considerations, you champion a more holistic approach that benefits all societal strata.
Finally, the blog effectively intertwines real-world examples with academic insights from publications by scholars like Scudder and McMillan, solidifying your arguments with well-referenced literature. The addition of the image from Ravencroft’s depiction of Battersea Power Station serves as a visual anchor, reinforcing the tangible implications of such large-scale urban projects (Ravencroft, 2022). Overall, your commentary provokes thought on the ethical responsibility of urban designers and policymakers to prioritize exclusivity and community welfare in shaping our urban landscapes.
References
Nixon, R. (2010). Unimagined communities: Developmental refugees, megadams and monumental modernity. New Formations, 69(69), 62-80. (Accessed: 2 January 2024).
Ravencroft, T (2022) Battersea October 05 2022. [online image] (Accessed: October 24, 2023) https://www.dezeen.com/2022/10/05/battersea-power-station-opens-wilkinson- eyre/. (Accessed: 2 January 2024)
Vijay, A. (2018). Dissipating the political: battersea power station and the temporal aesthetics of development. Open Cultural Studies, 2(1), 611-625. (Accessed: 2 January 2024)
Scudder, T. (1981) What It Means to be Dammed. Available at: https://calteches.library.caltech.edu/3291/1/Scudder.pdf. (Accessed: 2 January 2024)