Hi Gabie, thank you for your post which was very enlightening. I like the way you have introduced Talen’s concept of the right to an inclusive neighbourhood by first explaining Lefebvre’s concept of the inclusive city. It’s really helpful to have an overview of the concepts of inclusivity when we are considering the elements of effective urban spaces.
One question I have regards the practicality of embedding these concepts into designs in different parts of the world. Do you agree these concepts would be easier to embed in the cities of affluent, Westernised democracies than they would be to those of poorer, less developed or autocratic countries?
It is in the developed parts of the world the research is published, the political and legal systems are in place to manifest these changes, and above all, it is in these parts of the world the money is available to affect social change. I suspect the levels of inequality in poorer countries are even higher than the inequalities we see here, and yet these poorer parts of the world seem less able to do anything about it.
A lot of the published literature on reducing inequality seems to focus on making life even better for the residents of cities in the rich part of the world, but to really achieve Lefebvre’s goals, shouldn’t we be looking at strategies to help countries out of poverty, cancelling their debts, and giving them the tools they need to influence real social change?
Talen suggests Lefebvre’s ideas can be implemented by focusing on the local scale, the neighbourhood. I suggest we start challenging inequality by looking at how we can implement his ideas on a global scale.
Some useful reading on challenging global inequalities:
https://www.un.org/development/desa/dspd/wp-content/uploads/sites/22/2020/01/World-Social-Report-2020-FullReport.pdf
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/10/the-5-biggest-challenges-cities-will-face-in-the-future/
Hi Gabie, thank you for your post which was very enlightening. I like the way you have introduced Talen’s concept of the right to an inclusive neighbourhood by first explaining Lefebvre’s concept of the inclusive city. It’s really helpful to have an overview of the concepts of inclusivity when we are considering the elements of effective urban spaces.
One question I have regards the practicality of embedding these concepts into designs in different parts of the world. Do you agree these concepts would be easier to embed in the cities of affluent, Westernised democracies than they would be to those of poorer, less developed or autocratic countries?
It is in the developed parts of the world the research is published, the political and legal systems are in place to manifest these changes, and above all, it is in these parts of the world the money is available to affect social change. I suspect the levels of inequality in poorer countries are even higher than the inequalities we see here, and yet these poorer parts of the world seem less able to do anything about it.
A lot of the published literature on reducing inequality seems to focus on making life even better for the residents of cities in the rich part of the world, but to really achieve Lefebvre’s goals, shouldn’t we be looking at strategies to help countries out of poverty, cancelling their debts, and giving them the tools they need to influence real social change?
Talen suggests Lefebvre’s ideas can be implemented by focusing on the local scale, the neighbourhood. I suggest we start challenging inequality by looking at how we can implement his ideas on a global scale.
Some useful reading on challenging global inequalities:
https://www.un.org/development/desa/dspd/wp-content/uploads/sites/22/2020/01/World-Social-Report-2020-FullReport.pdf
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/10/the-5-biggest-challenges-cities-will-face-in-the-future/
https://www.global-taskforce.org/sites/default/files/2019-07/Towards%20the%20localization%20of%20the%20SDGs.pdf