At the beginning of the semester, I had the same confusion; my undergraduate background is in environmental design, not urban design, and I did not understand the scale of urban design and what design elements were needed, as well as the direction needed when designing. Through my studies, I gradually started to understand the course and that urban design focuses more on the functional and spatial aspects of the city rather than the landscape, planning the form and scale of the city for people, and of course most importantly for people. For me, urban planning varies a lot from country to country or city to city. As jiaxi mentioned, in the UK, urban planning is more about policy than some specific physical design, whereas architecture is the design of individual buildings on a smaller scale and scope. Therefore, when designing a project I find that it should probably be based on the scale of urban design to ensure a good mix of all these disciplines, one that provides a comfortable and harmonious urban environment for people.
In the early days of the modern city proposed by Corbusier, he saw the need to change the overcrowding in the city centre. Technical analysis and architectural synthesis could help him to realise his plan – ‘a contemporary city of three million inhabitants’. Corbusier divided the inhabitants into three groups (citizens, suburbanites and mixed groups) through their lifestyles and living environments and, on this basis, designed three large districts. He has designed only one station in the city centre, like a complex. The ground floor and the basement level have different uses, which improves the utilisation of the whole centre, but with good traffic conditions. There is no denying that Corbusier’s ideas have had a huge impact on modern architecture and urban design, and that skyscrapers can provide more open space for people, save on construction costs and generate a lot of profit for the government. (1) But in my opinion, this idea is too absolute. Every design should be unique and ‘interest’ is very important. Is the world really a better place when people are located in different parts of the world, but are no different from anywhere else? I don’t think so.
As living standards improve, more and more people are missing the people and things that have a story to tell. For example, historical streets rather than roads surrounded by skyscrapers.Like the following case:Model House – Renovation of No.28 Nanbanjie Hutong, China by BWAO.BWAO’s collection of previous project models was in a nomadic state and had always desired to find a home back into the hutong area. The project initiative started with the idea of bringing them back.No.28 is an independent courtyard that is sited close to the southern end of Nanbanjie Hutong. The only building in the courtyard is a single house that has five units, each of which is 3m in width and 7m in depth, a dimension rarely seen in courtyard houses. As a result, the clearance under the roof ridge reaches 5m in height, perfect for storage and display. The rest of the units are still occupied with local residents.(2)Urban designers are always going back and forth between innovation and retro as times change, and urban designers strive to maintain a balance between the two, creating unique, high-tech designs that are close to nature.
Reference;
1.“A Contemporary City” from The City of Tomorrow and its Planning (1929) Corbusier
2.https://www.gooood.cn/model-house-renovation-of-no-28-nanbanjie-hutong-china-by-bwao.htm?lang=en
At the beginning of the semester, I had the same confusion; my undergraduate background is in environmental design, not urban design, and I did not understand the scale of urban design and what design elements were needed, as well as the direction needed when designing. Through my studies, I gradually started to understand the course and that urban design focuses more on the functional and spatial aspects of the city rather than the landscape, planning the form and scale of the city for people, and of course most importantly for people. For me, urban planning varies a lot from country to country or city to city. As jiaxi mentioned, in the UK, urban planning is more about policy than some specific physical design, whereas architecture is the design of individual buildings on a smaller scale and scope. Therefore, when designing a project I find that it should probably be based on the scale of urban design to ensure a good mix of all these disciplines, one that provides a comfortable and harmonious urban environment for people.
In the early days of the modern city proposed by Corbusier, he saw the need to change the overcrowding in the city centre. Technical analysis and architectural synthesis could help him to realise his plan – ‘a contemporary city of three million inhabitants’. Corbusier divided the inhabitants into three groups (citizens, suburbanites and mixed groups) through their lifestyles and living environments and, on this basis, designed three large districts. He has designed only one station in the city centre, like a complex. The ground floor and the basement level have different uses, which improves the utilisation of the whole centre, but with good traffic conditions. There is no denying that Corbusier’s ideas have had a huge impact on modern architecture and urban design, and that skyscrapers can provide more open space for people, save on construction costs and generate a lot of profit for the government. (1) But in my opinion, this idea is too absolute. Every design should be unique and ‘interest’ is very important. Is the world really a better place when people are located in different parts of the world, but are no different from anywhere else? I don’t think so.
As living standards improve, more and more people are missing the people and things that have a story to tell. For example, historical streets rather than roads surrounded by skyscrapers.Like the following case:Model House – Renovation of No.28 Nanbanjie Hutong, China by BWAO.BWAO’s collection of previous project models was in a nomadic state and had always desired to find a home back into the hutong area. The project initiative started with the idea of bringing them back.No.28 is an independent courtyard that is sited close to the southern end of Nanbanjie Hutong. The only building in the courtyard is a single house that has five units, each of which is 3m in width and 7m in depth, a dimension rarely seen in courtyard houses. As a result, the clearance under the roof ridge reaches 5m in height, perfect for storage and display. The rest of the units are still occupied with local residents.(2)Urban designers are always going back and forth between innovation and retro as times change, and urban designers strive to maintain a balance between the two, creating unique, high-tech designs that are close to nature.
Reference;
1.“A Contemporary City” from The City of Tomorrow and its Planning (1929) Corbusier
2.https://www.gooood.cn/model-house-renovation-of-no-28-nanbanjie-hutong-china-by-bwao.htm?lang=en